copenhagen • Chamonix Green & White
Massif Monitor Live User Monitor Live Server Monitor Cloud Server Details Live User Monitor

What is Massif Monitor?

Massif Monitor
It's a Cloud based monitoring layer which can be used to view practically any data in real time. This can include data from the cpu of any device using our compiled linux service, msfmon or real time web user monitoring with live user geolocation.

real time web user monitoring

tings tings get created when a user visits your sites. It saves a small record of that person's visit which can be viewed in our GUI in real time. It's Quicker than Google Analytics and much more meaningful.

Cloud Server Web Hosting

microsites Cloud Servers can host multiple webistes.
This one also hosts the Living Websites Group of MicroSites



Monitor Cloud Server in real time

monitor See what's happening on the actual processor as it happens. This helps identify, predicts and defect against problems and outatages

Cloud Server Details

server Get the lowdown on the server your application is running on.
where is it,
and what is it?

resolving ip geolocation
getting device data...
tings_top

Mark Lynas’s Copenhagen Notebook

The Independent (The Independent)
Clipped on Monday, December 14, 2009, 07:19 PM

Very few people seem to realise this, but the Kyoto protocol divided the world. With its strict definitions of haves and have-nots, developed and developing, the divisions between rich and poor enshrined in the 1997 treaty are almost as rigid as those between the West and the Eastern bloc in the Cold War. Except that instead of an Iron Curtain, what lies between the two sets of countries is known rather cryptically as “the firewall”. Industrialised countries are not all rich; their ranks include the likes of Ukraine and Croatia.

Nor are all developing countries poor: Singapore and the United Arab Emirates, for example, hardly need to beg for aid. But the distinction matters because under Kyoto only “rich” countries had to make cuts in their carbon emissions. Poor nations, in recognition of their lower per-person emissions and their smaller historical responsibility for causing global warming, were expected to follow suit only when they attained industrialised status.

This all makes sense from an equity perspective – but is shaping up to be extremely bad news for the planet. For if we are to keep temperature rise within tolerable bounds (1.5C is the upper limit, according to front-line vulnerable states like Bangladesh and Tuvalu) then global emissions need to peak about now and start coming rapidly down again, eventually reaching zero by about mid-century. This in turn means that big developing countries like China, India and Brazil, who are expected to account for almost all emissions rises in future, must also take on targets here at Copenhagen – thereby breaching the Kyoto firewall.

In fairness, India and China have both come to this meeting offering targets – but only to cut their emissions intensity (carbon emitted per unit of GDP) not their absolute levels of carbon output. Using this metric, a Chinese CO2 “cut” of 45 per cent translates into a real-world rise of about 100 per cent. By any reasonable scientific measure, this is a recipe for climate chaos.

Login

or Register a FREE Account

register

Chamonix Green & White

copenhagen